As I said earlier my post was only a rebuttal to the claim that very few real scientists support anthropogenic climate change, I believe that many real scientists do think anthropogenic climate change is happening and have been posting to say that this is the case. Those are not nations that are signing the report, its the national academies of those nations - things like the Royal Society. Scientific organizations - not governments.
You're arguing against me on a subject I'm not arguing for in is topic. I never claimed that consensus made it true, I'm claiming that the large amount of support in the scientific establishment for anthropogenic climate change proves that very many real scientists do believe it to be happening.
I honestly don't want to be drawn into a debate on climate change because I know that I would be woefully under prepared - I do not have an extensive knowledge of the subject and as such am willing to leave it to people who have a better understanding of it to debate it.
Just to summarise - this entire post train came from me arguing against this post;
"Very few "real" scientists will make the claim that increases in man made CO2 are leading to long term cataclysmic changes to the climate based on a short term warming trend and unproven climate models."
That's the only thing I was arguing against - not on the claim of whether it is happening or not.
