Griffin said:
"Resistance vs Halo 3 would work better, right?" I would say yes but Halo is not HD so it does not count. Sorry, but screen resolution is NOT related to disc size. So you can't use that to claim Halo 3 can't compare to Resistance, since the things that ARE related to disc size, texture resolution, unique textures and levels, game layout for loading, are comparable. The major performance differences are the lighting (which caused the reduced screen resolution), and FMVs (which Insomniac said used about 16GB of disc space). If you took the FMVs out of Resistance, and the lighting out of Halo 3, they would run at aobut the same, and take about the same disc space.
Blu-ray is needed this gen and thats a fact, multiple games on the 360 take up more then one disc. The guys who made PGR4 already had to change their game to make it fit on DVD9, the rockstar VP Dan Houser said that the lack of HDD and the small disc size of DVD9 is a limit on what they wanted to do.
Most multiplatform games look better on the PS3, the only people having problems are EA and Ubisoft, and they suck and just toss out as many games as possible with as little man hours as they can manage.
The new CoD is better on the Ps3 then the 360, better lighting, better textures and some other stuff. This was even mentioned on a 360 site preview for CoD4.
The new UT game will be limited by DVD9, the guys at Epic have basically said this. They plan to fill the blu-ray disc if they have enough time, over 40 maps last i heard. |
