The fight over Darwin - Teaching evolution in schools

[appolose]

Khuutra said:

appolose said:

The "negative version" of that is exactly the same thing; of course you can say it.

And why do you keep bringing up things contradictory observations?  My scenario does not consist of those, as I have said countless times now.

If you mean eliminate as in deductively eliminate, then, of course, you're right.  Likewise, you can never deductively prove anything either, so I'm not sure what your point is.  Science is an inductive process.

In my scenario, if you induced non-physicality, then you've induced supernaturality.

You can't do that either.

Here's an example of induction;

"All geese I've ever seen are white.  I assume, then, that all geese are white"

And another;

"All geese I've ever seen are not blue.  I asssume, then, that no goose is blue"

Neither follow, and both are what science do.