By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Well I don't see how you can use Reiter - a single man - as proof that the entire IPCC is not scientific. There will always be criticisms from individuals of any large body. In any case I don't see how you can say that very few real scientists believe in anthropogenic global warming when the national academies of the following countries have signed joint statements that it is the case.

Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Caribbean
Canada
China
France
Germany
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Malaysia
Mexico
New Zealand
Russia
South Africa
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States


Now I'm not saying that the consensus means that its definitely true, I'm just rebutting HappySquirrel's point that; "Very few "real" scientists will make the claim that increases in man made CO2 are leading to long term cataclysmic changes to the climate based on a short term warming trend and unproven climate models."

I actually hadn't realised that it was HS who posted that not you. So I should actually have said I think HS is ignorant of the current opinion on climate change.