By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
When I said that, I thought you understood that theories are open to being proved wrong.

So in that case the first point, A THEORY, could simply be wrong, and that is what science would conclude.

Of course they are.  We both agree that they are inductions, and that  counter-observations are what disproves them.  What that has to do with our argument, I don't know, since my examples do not have counter-observations.



Okami

To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made.  I won't open my unworthy mouth.

Christian (+50).  Arminian(+20). AG adherent(+20). YEC(+20). Pre-tribulation Pre-milleniumist (+10).  Republican (+15) Capitalist (+15).  Pro-Nintendo (+5).  Misc. stances (+30).  TOTAL SCORE: 195
  http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=43870 <---- Fun theology quiz