| Final-Fan said: When I said that, I thought you understood that theories are open to being proved wrong. So in that case the first point, A THEORY, could simply be wrong, and that is what science would conclude. |
Of course they are. We both agree that they are inductions, and that counter-observations are what disproves them. What that has to do with our argument, I don't know, since my examples do not have counter-observations.
Okami
To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made. I won't open my unworthy mouth.







