johnlucas said:
Well for one... "In the late 1980s, he was watching his daughter with a Famicom and realized the potential that existed within video games. At that particular time, Sony's executives had very little interest in video games..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Kutaragi#Role_in_the_gaming_industry No Famicom, no Kutaragi in gaming. No Miyamoto, no Donkey Kong, no Mario, No Zelda, no Famicom/NES. No Miyamoto, no Famicom/NES worldwide cultural insemination, no Kutaragi daughter playing, no Kutaragi in gaming. No Miyamoto, no Famicom, no shift of videogame industry's capital to Japan, no Famicom/NES worldwide cultural insemination, no videogame industry period, no potential profits for newcomers, no Sony exec interest in jumping into gaming at Kutaragi behest. No Miyamoto, no Mega Man, no Sonic, no game design benchmarks, no hardware innovations, no advancements. No Miyamoto, no Nintendo...no Nintendo, no industry, no legacy. I could go on, you know. Miyamoto is just that important. John Lucas |
finally a anwser.
No bushnell No atari, no Nin video games, no Miyamoto.
other have similar thoughts.
