Hus said: Sowhat exacly has Miyamoto done thats so influential ? simple nuff question. |
You don't seem to get it, but I'll try to explain again. Without Miyamoto there would be no Super Mario Bros (the best selling game ever). Without Super Mario the console gaming business would have died off. Without console gaming there would be no SNES-CD for Kutaragi. Without SNES-CD there would be no Playstation and finally no Vgcharts with ignorant Sony fanboys asking dumb questions. This is basic history of videogaming.
And if Miyamoto wasn't influential, then why was he chosen by the TIME magazine to the voting and holds the second place now? Have you ever tried to judge things objectively?
Even if Kutaragi would have seen the mass market potential of videogames without Nintendo, he would not have been able to carry out his plans because Sony's executives thought videogaming was just a fad. That is why Kutaragi secretly teamed up with Nintendo in his early years of design. Kutaragi is more of a general thinker, he isn't a crazy creative person like Miyamoto.
