Demotruk on 24 September 2009
| dbot said: The per player cost is the same. |
You see no problem adding an imaginary 59.98 that nobody will have to pay to your calculation?
If you want to include the initial remote+nunchuck, you'd have to include the consoles in the comparison, which wouldn't favour the PS3 (which is more expensive and doesn't include a wand or camera).
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.
