By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor on 23 September 2009
Edit Thread
--OkeyDokey-- said:
selnor said:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
@ selnor

Those videos aren't doing you any favors.

I can admit Forza has better physics, damage and customization. Why can't you admit GT5 has better graphics?


LOL. Dude I dont know what your watching. It's pretty clear to me that Forza 3 looks more real. The colours are better during gameplay to. I'm only talking gameplay. Because GT5 looks significantly different to it's trailers and CGI E309. Forza 3 has proven all along its screenshots were never bullshots. GT5 hasn't.

Alright then, so here's your argument in a nutshell.

"LOL, LOL, every screen of GT5 is teh CGI/bullshots/replay LOL GT5 always look better when direct comparison is made cuz all GT5 are bullshot, LOL look at tiny crappy quality off screen footage LOL GT5 still look better but trees are more real looking to me than buildings so Forza win, LOL"

So what your saying is dont go off gameplay, just go off screens and replays. Even then You can find good shots and bad shots of both games. The majority of time is spent in gameplay, so that is where the graphics matter. Is it not?

@ Ryusuken:

They aren't biased assumptions. They are facts. Polyphony have always put in alot of effects to replays and photomode.

"it really is breathtaking at times, and all at 1080p and 60fps (although replays are half that, with added extra effects like motion blur)."

http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2008/03/27/gran-turismo-5-prologue/

If you cant see a difference between the actual gameplay footage and the tribute video made by Polyphony, than there really is no end to fanboyism. It's like me calling the following all ingame footage of Forza 3. Notice how this looks just as good as the Polyphony enhanced GT video of the Ferrari. Extra reflections, depth of field etc. Cmon man. I dont use this video to say how good Forza 3 looks. Even if it is based on the game engine. LOL.