| Kasz216 said: No. 4,000 is the expected deaths total. 5,000 total deaths are supposed to be caused indirectly.
All an all it's a very tame disaster. It's going to kill around 9,000 people worst case scenario... and the VAST majority is going to be over 20 years later. Also there hasn't been too much damage to the animals. If you look at the study i posted, the animals who lioved right near the zone have no genetic damage. Despite living their entire lives there. |
Confused slightly, are you saying 4,000 total or 5,000 total? Either way, from the incident itself and since only 54 people may have died. But radiation and other effect will cause other deaths, yes, they might be a long way down the line but never call it a 'tame disaster', jsut a long drawn out distaster.
Although I'm also confused as to how you can put the word 'tame' to the word disaster, any distaster is anything but tame, especially for the people involved.
@slimebeast
the BNP are not the National Party, they are a racist party.
Hmm, pie.
