Shambolic on 03 November 2007
I agree, the review itself is a far more useful indicator of whether you will like the game.
What I really dislike is the trend of scoring out of a hundred or out of ten point something. A review score gives an indication of how good the game is, simply marking it out of ten is sufficient, but they try to be ridiculously accurate for some reason. If a game is really excellent then it deserves 10 out of 10, not 97%, what's the difference really? It's just impractical, some games end up with higher scores than others that the review states it isn't as good as.
I don't know why but this gets me disproportionatly angry.
