By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
appolose on 22 September 2009
Edit Thread
ManusJustus said:
appolose said:
ManusJustus said:
I like the double standard here. I am wrong for assuming that my computer exists and he gets to assume that a supernatural being described in a 2,000 year old book exists.

I never said you were wrong for assuming, but merely that you were assuming (everything).

I don't actually think science can do anything. If science, then  I'm merely saying in my argument "If science, then...".

...

I'm aiming to demonstrate the possibility of a supernatural explanation.

A supernatural explanation in itself is a huge assumption.

First, you have to assume that a supernatural being exists, then you have to assume that that supernatural being interacts withthe physical world.

I agree - my argument with you was about whether or not anything can be proven about reality.



Okami

To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made.  I won't open my unworthy mouth.

Christian (+50).  Arminian(+20). AG adherent(+20). YEC(+20). Pre-tribulation Pre-milleniumist (+10).  Republican (+15) Capitalist (+15).  Pro-Nintendo (+5).  Misc. stances (+30).  TOTAL SCORE: 195
  http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=43870 <---- Fun theology quiz