The fight over Darwin - Teaching evolution in schools

[ManusJustus]

appolose said:

ManusJustus said:
I like the double standard here. I am wrong for assuming that my computer exists and he gets to assume that a supernatural being described in a 2,000 year old book exists.

I never said you were wrong for assuming, but merely that you were assuming (everything).

I don't actually think science can do anything. If science, then  I'm merely saying in my argument "If science, then...".

...

I'm aiming to demonstrate the possibility of a supernatural explanation.

A supernatural explanation in itself is a huge assumption.

First, you have to assume that a supernatural being exists, then you have to assume that that supernatural being interacts withthe physical world.