ultima said:
No, no, no, you're wrong. Bush claimed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, which as it has been discovered, he never did. And Bush never cared about Iraqis, as can be seen by the civilian casualties number. Don't try to justify his actions. |
Saddam did have them and used them on the Kurds in Halabja. The UN inspecters viewed a site with nothing in it b/c the Ba'ath Party leaders and Saddam knew that if you give them something decent to look at then the dirty stuff like VX is "nonexistent" in the mind of the UN.
In the end whether Saddam had nukes 2003 or wanted to try and get them so he could use them years down the road, one cannot deny that he was a danger to the world. Here's proof for you to ponder:








