appolose said:
You said it right here, "And yes, it takes more than one observation, but all it takes is a repeatable phenomenon that contradicts a theoyr and the theory's gone, out the window, bye-bye". That is more than one instance. My scenario with Rath was "Matter cannot be created physically. Matter comes into existence" In conjuction with the first observation (which, mind you, is hypothetical), that gives the situation I described above. Hopefully, that clears it up. |
Then I misspoke.
And sorry, but science does not make absolute statements that way. If we say that matter cannot be created, we only mean it in the context of our understanding of the universe. You might as well say "something breaks the theory of conservation of matter and energy", which is what you are proposing. If such were to happen, then we would change the theory.
Like I said: you can't come up with a scenario that suggests the supernatural. it's not possible.







