By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
disolitude on 21 September 2009
Edit Thread
Sardauk said:
Qumulox said:
disolitude said:
Qumulox said:
Sooo they give MGS4 an 8 but an expansion pack/spin off gets a 9.

Seems right to me... if MGS3 got 8 Id be angry but not 4.

I'm sorry but I just can't respect them as reviewers, MGS4 is one of the best games ever and I don't think a game who is shorter and doesn't have as high production values can be better than it.

Well that is the problem of MGS4 : A very high production value that lacks a bit/lot of gameplay actually.

I was really impressed when I saw it, but this is the first time I had a bitter taste in my mouth while playing MGS (Wayyyyyy to much cutscenes.. and that silly story... ).

Nothing will ever beat Snake Eater, best of the series.


Amen. MGS3 is still in my top 10 of all time. So is MGS1. MGS2 and 4...not so much...