appolose on 21 September 2009
| Rath said: Or he had a laptop running on battery and wireless =D Also what science can't explain science won't explain, its not breaking logic its just leaving a mystery unsolved. It will never accept on non-falsifiable hypothesis because that violates the scientific method. |
It is breaking logic; the basic tenant of science is :"If it is observed enough, it is assumed true". Thus, in the event of two contradictory well-established observations, you would have a contradiction (they're both assumed to be true, as they've both been observed enough). You can't leave it unexplained. So, you are left with two choices; either forsake the basic tenant, or impose the only logical answer (supernatural).
Okami
To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made. I won't open my unworthy mouth.
