By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
disolitude on 21 September 2009
Edit Thread
psrock said:
twesterm said:
Qumulox said:
disolitude said:
Qumulox said:
Sooo they give MGS4 an 8 but an expansion pack/spin off gets a 9.

Seems right to me... if MGS3 got 8 Id be angry but not 4.

I'm sorry but I just can't respect them as reviewers, MGS4 is one of the best games ever and I don't think a game who is shorter and doesn't have as high production values can be better than it.

Because game length and pretty graphics are what really matters?

Reviews are opinons-- read into them whatever you want.

-edit-

Slightly on topic, but I do think the Halo series still has some of the ugliest face models this gen.  I watched the Game Trailers review this morning and just couldn't believe that they still looked that bad.

Those wonderful graphics got a 9 from IGN.


It does look kinda bad at times when it comes to faces...but when game is in motion it looks as good as any other 360 FPS.

One must understand things like scope, draw distance, split screen multiplayer to understand that Halo really looks the best it can on the 360 with what ts trying to do.