stof said:
TheRealMafoo said:
stof said:
I really don't think that was a mistake at all. Haven't many analysts said that even during the recovery, substantial job creation won't be for a while, and if a recovery starts with the strengthening of financial institutions and ends with that leading to more jobs, doesn't that mean that the jobs come at the end portion of the recovery?
I'm not trying to make this a political argument (really, how obnoxious do you have to be to try and turn a dumb quote thread in to a political argument?) But he did say "at the end of", and not "after" And I a substantial drop in the unemployment rate is one of the latter occurances in the e
conomic recovery... then wouldn't what he said be right?
|
You'd have to be pretty damned obnoxious...
|
I agree.
Seriously people. The political ass-hattery ends now. If a politician says something stupid "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." or "I've now been in 57 states -- I think one left to go." that's great.
If you just want to pull partisan crap, you stay out of this thread.
|
Was that response pointed at me? Because I think I was fairly clear when I said both parties would have done the same thing. I also called Bush an idiot. Nothing about my response was partisan.
Plus, I only intended to comment once in this thread, but people responded to me in a manner I felt deserved comment. Including you.
