crumas2 said:
Most of the time graphic comparisons are little more than subjective. There are so many variables that go into the final result that it usually takes a significant difference in quality to claim one game's visuals are clearly superior to another's. I've heard people argue back and forth in threads, often comparing minutia in screen shots (which aren't even valid comparisons as frame-to-frame deltas can make a lot of difference in the final result), trying to point out how one image has better contrast, or shadows, or more details, or better color, or resolution, etc., etc. It all boils down to how the end-user perceives the result, not what the technical aspects are of the elements. I've seen paintings that look almost photo realistic, yet they're not considered to be as beautiful as a Rembrandt or a Monet. You're dealing with consumers at the end, so which game has the best graphics will always be an opinion. And I have to laugh at some of the responses to Selnor's post of Forza 3 video... I have to believe that some PS3 fans couldn't bring themselves to admit that the 360 is capable of graphics equal to anything created so far on the PS3, even if they were shown something that was completely photo-realistic. My prediction is that a year from now some PS3 fan will take a look at Alan Wake video and proclaim, "yeah, right... Uncharted 1 blows that away." |
Even if thats true, KZ2 and U2 are still best beating every other game in all variables.
