By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Rath said:
Kasz216 said:
 

It kinda does matter.  Since as you know scientists today make more sense then scientsits back then.

Claiming a need for emperical evidence is interesting considering the debate we just had a week or two back where you were for the Quantum mind theory though... considering its considerably less likely then other consiousness theories and has no emperical backing.

 

None of the theories of consciousness have emperical backing. I merely claimed that quantum mind is one hypothesis.

How does what you state here differ with people who believe in a god?

Though there is empircal evidence against QMT.

1). It is possible for quantum mind to be falsified. As such it is a valid scientific hypothesis, god isn't.

2). My belief that it is possibly true (I'm really not convinced) does not make it true any more than the beliefs of these scientists makes god true

3). There are well established scientific theories and scientific facts which contradict the literal interpretation of the bible. While these are not absolute they do seem to weigh the scales ridiculously heavily againts young earth creationism.

Also can you give me that emperical evidence? I'm really interested in the subject.