By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MAFKKA on 20 September 2009
Edit Thread
TheTruthHurts! said:
MAFKKA said:
 

ARE YOU FOR REAL? I tried to be nice and i even went back and found you the quote...

If you actually read my first post instead of jumping the gun and showing your true fanboy self, you'd see what my remarks were targeting! Who the fudge do you think you are flaiming me?

Answer me this: 

1. Re-post my negative remark and bold me the negative part.
2. Why do I have to be able to play the game TO QUESTION THE REVIEWER and NOT the REVIEW!?  
3. Why cant i comment on a game without reading full reviews when i QUESTIONED THE REVIEWER and NOT the REVIEW
4. Why do i have to have experience of a game when i QUESTIONED THE REVIEWER, and NOT the REVIEW!?
5. What makes you say im not reading full reviews? When I was the one who actually read the review? You didn't!!
6. The review i read and quoted was the second post in the same thread by the same user who made this thread. WHY cant i comment on that review when it is in this thread? Where else do you suggest i'd post my statement?


Such a fanboy.. jumping on me when you dont even know what ive said, what ive read, what im talking about and what i am questioning. You just suffered from selective perception and read what you wanted to read. And you proved it some post ago "8 is average" and "bungie lied". Thats all you saw and was quick to try to defend a freaking videogame over internet! Flaming me!!

But you will soon see that you've failed, once you try answering my questions. I hope the foot tastes good.

           OK, you asked for it so I have answered in yellow above.  Now remember, I am not the only one who called you out, Zen & Disolade called you out also, (and only after your continued ranting, I am sure I will not be the last). 

           You have already proven YOUR the Fanboy in this thread,....... but if you want to continue with the embarasment, I guess I can help you out with that one  . 

First..

You didn't answer any of my questionsm since you still dont see my point... and for the negative part.. let me highlight it so you see what im saying.

Dont see how .....!!!!  Innovation   !!!! ........can be at 8.7 when...... !!!!    HE   !!!........ complains about old graphics, same gameplay, no new guns or vehicles, and that Bungie had lied about this being completly new game experience"

 

There you go.. its right there in the first post. Let me break it down for you even further.

I, myself, feels that the score of 8.7 for Innovation, stated in the Teamxbox review by the reviewer of that same review, is too high in refrerence to what his review is telling us gamers. And this is because he, the reviewer, writes with his own words that nothing has changed and theres nothing new added. And Innovation, or Innovative, by definiton is;
- being or producing something like nothing done or experienced or created before

And since he, the reviewer, constantly broght up that nothing is new. I, as in myself, questioned how he could give a 8.7 score for Innovation, when 8.7 is really good. Its like saying that "nothing is new, but it plays like nothing you've ever played before" Which just contradicts itself.

So to sum it up... when I asked how the score could be 8.7 i was refering to the score of Innovation in correlation to what the reviwer had written in his review. But it would be hard for you to see past that since your fanboy self couldnt comprehend the word HE, and since you hadn't even read the review.. non of them infact... i dont see why you would even jump into the discussion since you clearly didn't know what the hell i was talking about.

 

And your entire point is about me not using IGN as a source. But that has nothing to do with the question:

2. Why do i have to be able to play the game to question the reviewer??
I'll answer it for you. I dont. Since the game itself has nothing to do with the question i asked in my first post.

Its like saying i have to have played Pokémon for me to question why a reviewer has it at 10/10 when all he writes is negative. Why would my game experience with Pokémon change the fact that the review dont correlate with what the score is? Its like saying "Uncharted 2 is the worst piece of crap game i've ever played - 10/10". And the same goes for my initial question. He states throughout the review that "theres no new guns, no new vehicles, gameplay hasnt changed, bungies statement about this being nothing like the others isnt true and you can tell that the graphics is old but DAMN this is so innovative. 8.7!!