Will the 360 get a slim version once it moves down to 32nm?

[-ku-]

JamesCizuz said:
Oh and before anyone claims it, I love the 360, not saying it's not powerful, just saying Microsoft sucks at DESIGNING hardware, not making it powerful. Anyone who claims they even remotely know what they are doing is lying.

They spent over a billion dollars trying to fix the RROD, and fired the original team who designed it because of it. However the original teams design was basically what I described, it was Microsoft putting pressure on them to make it as cheap as possibly which made it that way.

Not that it's cheap, original 360 cost 600$ to produce and they sold it at a loss, they just didn't want to sell 700$ machine at a loss when they could sell a 500 or 600$ machine at a loss.

PS3 manufacturing costs for 950$, they sold it for 600$, for contrast.

Woah didn't the 360 price loss, thanks for the knowledge.

 

While M$ spent $1 billion on RROD the PS3 spent 3 billion on original PS3 research and devolpment and another .25 billion for slim.

 

I love PS3 but the only problem is the 360 is built with customability and practical use in mode. Though both systems are aesthetically pleasing. the 360 is a score and has plastic-like body wear allowign first easy placement, less storage waste and plus all the  design packs. Newest ones being the cod MW2 and Beatles.

I just wish Sony woulld change their material to a cheaper covering but with different colours and styles.

I would easily buy a flaming ps3 or MGS4/ Uncharted to painted PS3.

 

Another thing is why do most product VG and other wise have sites to askk fans for opinions and new feature adds whileconsole makers don't.

Here's a freeby for you big three, do it and you'll boost sales. Who knows there might be a top notch indie engineer out there who just want a cooler console.