Vetteman94 said:
Its only innaccurate because you arguement fails because of it, and you dont like that. If it was such an innacurate way of tracking marketshare why did the number one source for home media sales information change to Total Revenue instead of Top 20 revenue? Because it didnt accurately reflect the market thats why. Because basically what you are saying is that not one person who still buys DVDs on a regular basis goes back and gets an older movie that was released 5+ years ago. Which is complete BS. Both Blu-ray and DVD owners are buying back catalogs, thinking otherwise is being ignorant. |
What? Innacurate because my argument fails.
I'l explain. Twister on DVD came out in late 90's on DVD. Everyone who wants Twister on DVD already has it, bar a few people still not got DVD player yet. Now for example BluRay comes out later than 2006. Now, of course Twister will sell well on BluRay because of the new adopters rebuying now on BluRay. But to see accurate marketshare you need to take into account all the Twister sales for DVD since it was released. Because there will be noone buying it now. Then it will give you an accurate marketshare. The only way to tell is to guage the marketshare off of new films released side by side on DVD and Bluray. That is the accurate marketshare. Because thats all DVD will sell now becasue everyone already owns the older films. You see?







