Falcon095 on 19 September 2009
If he hadnt answered (which i thought that was going to happen btw) I probably would've voted for him (or at very least make a warning about him) but he did answered and it was a good answer, I couldn't think in any way to counter it so I don't think that voting for him just for that would've been a good idea because if you think about it, it isnt a reason to justify a vote (It made him look very suspicious, tough), at least not in day 1, we're are not that desperate in day 1 
