appolose said:
Yeah, I've caught a lot of flack for this in the past :/ Basicially, by evolution, I'm not referring to the overly-broad "descent with modification" - we've know that a child will look different from its parents for a good while now. Nor do I mean by evolution even natural selection combined with random mutation (I acknowledge both of those as true). By evolution, I mean the idea that, given natural selection and random mutation, a bird could eventually have a fish for a descendent. |
Okay hold up
Hold up
Let's say I take a breed of dog and from these dogs over hundreds of accelerated generations I breed them into animals the size of deer, which bear no outward resemblance to their ancestors and require very different kinds of nutrition in order to function.
Is that evolution?







