Baroque_Dude said:
I know, I know that the chromosomic issue is far more complex but that was a way of speaking. I mean that, what if chimpanzees are a 95% identical to humans? If we have a 34% percentage with mice and we are soooo different, then I think is more natural to have a greater similarity with more similar animals like chimpanzees are. |
I'm not talking about having things in common with chimpanzees. I'm talking about how chimpanzees have more chromosomes than humans. The argument against evolution was that as things evolve they can ONLY become more complex by creating more chromosomes, and not lose any pairs of chromosomes. So it was hypothesized that during that change some of the chromosomes stuck together, so one human chromosome should have 2 centers, like how if 2 eggs get cooked together it will look like 1 big egg with 2 yolks.
They mapped out all our chromosomes and discovered exactly which 2 chimp chromosomes got stuck together, and which one it is in the human, and where it moved to. These results proved the hypothesis correct, and debunked that particular anti-evolution argument. Now the only argument left is "Satan went back in time and played with our DNA to trick us into believing that things adapt over time."
I really don't see why the idea that things adapt to their surroundings is so evil. Everything does it. When it's one person adapting, we call it common sense, and when it's a species adapting over a long period of time, we call it evolution.













