Crashdown77 said:
uber said:
Crashdown77 said:
Xoj said:
because killzone 2, uncharted 2, and many games releasing now are HIGH budget productions. costing over 20-40 million.
they polish everything to make a good game.
|
No, they polish everything to make a polished game. I would rather play something with last-gen graphics that is fun than Killzone 2 with all it's "polish" any day and every day, and I know I'm not in a minority here. This does not apply to Uncharted, that game they did put a lot of time into making it a good game, and Uncharted 2 will deserve every high (but non-perfect 10) score it gets.
|
that comment right there disqualifies you from any objective discussion. how do you justify precluding the game from any perfect scores? you might as just well state that the fact that it's on the playstation is a detriment in scoring it.
|
Not just this game. I don't believe any game can get a 10/10, that would mean it's perfect. No game is perfect. I think that if a game were perfect, every single person that played it would think that it is the best game they have ever played. Perfection means nothing is better, nothing can ever be better. Not possible. I think Uncharted 2 should get a really high score, I'm on record all over this site hyping this thing up, but it will NOT be "perfect".
|
You can't look at a 10/10 as perfect. Especially on scales that are only out of 5 or 10. If a 10 is unachievable, then a 9 is essentially a perfect score. So then nothing can be a 9, etc etc. Just think about if scores were a thumbs up or down. Should everything be thumbs down because nothing is perfect?
