By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MAFKKA on 18 September 2009
Edit Thread
slowmo said:
alanshearer said:
Cypher1980 said:
Christhegamer said:
I totally agree with the BBC, Sony do have a problem with the PS3 and the sooner it is covered with a extended warrany the better... I say that if it is less then 1% it will not cost them very much. Also I wrote to watchdog about 2 weeks ago to explain what happened to my PS3.. I hope this is because of me and my PS3... because when I was on my second reapir I called Sony and said I would write to them and make as much noise as I could.. Lets hope the little man has been heard

Good for you Chris

So many people on these forums seem to think that a console breaking after 24 months is par for the course.

Its just this type of drop trousers and touch toes attitude that lets big companies get away with poor QA.

I honestly cannot understand the attitude of some people on these forums.

For the record and I appreciate its a difficult concept for fanboys everywhere.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

You own a video console. You paid good money for it.

You didnt invent the sodding thing and the companies dont deserve your mis placed loyalty.

You fanboys should grow a brain. By the BBC's own reporting 0.5% of PS3's fail. It was a stitchup by the BBC nothing more.

0.5% just for YLOD supposedly that doesn't include all other faults.  Try growing a brain yourself and some manners wouldn't go amiss...

Thats true... but the issue here was YLOD, not "Oh crap i droped my PS3 down some stairs"-failurs. So a brain for xmas might due you some good aswell.