Final-Fan said:
Kenryoku_Maxis said:
Also, I'd like to point out, while it may seem that all units in Starcraft are 'unique', they are...sort of. Marines are still comperable to Zerglings, who are still comperable to Zelots. And etc on down the line. They all have unique abilities and Str/HP, but they still serve the same purpose for their specific race. And that's what makes Starcraft work. All three races are in a triangle balance with each other (though Terran is arguably overpowered). Why is it so bad that AOE3 has similar units, when there's 14 different races? Or do we have to make up a different kind of swordsman for French troops than Spanish? After you go beyond 4 races, balancing becomes an issue. Again, that's how Starcraft works so well, because it stuck to 3 races. |
I'm not going to try to comment on "StarCraft vs. AoE/CoH" because it's trench warfare and I don't even know the other ones too well. And to be honest, it's been a long time since I played StarCraft. Nevertheless:
Your assertion that Zerglings/Marines/Zealots are all 'basically the same' just because they're the cheapest basic combat unit is just wrong. Zerglings require different tactics to use effectively compared to using Marines of Zealots. Marines can shoot at air units while the other two can't, and Marines are ranged and the other two aren't. Ranged fire is a HUGE difference -- not just because a ranged unit gets "free" hits before the other unit closes, but because it's easier to gang up without having to be physically adjacent to the target. The Zealot, meanwhile, although behaving similarly to the Zergling, is a massively stronger unit.
I'd say the Hydralisk is closer to being a counterpart to the Marine than the Zergling is, or rather the Marine is in between the two of them in power. Which just proves that there is no direct equivalent. You can't just use the same tactics with another race.
It's true that with huge numbers of races, balancing completely different unit types would become an unreasonably difficult task to ask of a game maker -- but why does that give the game a pass? It's their fault for insisting on tons of races, knowing that that would be a consequence. Or you can argue that the unique units/abilities that the races DO get make up for it when there are so many to pick from -- but if so, say that instead of making excuses.
|
1) I didn't say those three base units (Zergling/Marine/Zelot) are 'basically the same'. I said they complement each other in a triange based counter system. If anything, your long analysis once again provided a detailed example of how Terran has a one up on the other races.
2) I wasn't trying to provide an 'excuse' to why games with more than 3-4 races don't have more unique units. Its more like defending games for actually trying to move the genre forward, among the many people who just say 'Starcraft is perfect, everything else after sucks because its not Starcraft'. People provide countless examples, and one major example is always 'Well all the races seem the same and use similar units'. I just provided a counter point showing how not all the races are the same while also showing how the units in Starcraft are unique, but also fit the same specific molds in each race (light infantry, heavy infantry, light armor, heavy armor, light air, heavy air, reconnaissance unit, defense turret, etc). Yes, the units in Starcraft also come with unique abilities that make them different from the other races, but they still conform to their roles as these basic unit types. And to say AOE (or any other RTS, like Red Alert or Company of Heroes) sucks because they don't provide as much 'variety' as Starcraft, is simply ridiculous. In some ways, other RTS games provide more variety and more units. Take Age of Mythologies or Company of Heroes for instance.
