MAFKKA said:
Falcon204 said:
MAFKKA said:
Whoops..
Can't we all just not talk or write in this thread, and just sit back and watch the awesomeness that this gen has produced? ;D No need for in-depth views on what makes games look good.
Even if 2 or 4 splitscreens would tear up the beauty of these games, there is still no winner! So what if Uncharted 2 "would've" looked bad due to splitscreen. Or if Forza 3 "would've" looked greater than GT5 if they hadn't done 4 player splitscreen or whatever. Thats not the point of this thread.
The point is.. PS3 was marketed as a "superior" console, still we have games that look worse on the PS3 compared to others. But when some developers decide to go exclusive, the PS3 tend to get amazing looking games that are always in the forefront of graphic comparisons. Games that really makes the console shine in all its glory and really makes sense of why some people claim the PS3 to be "more powerful". |
I agree its just i hate the whole mentallity of the people that think "because its on ps3 its better than anything else" or "because its on ps3 it cant be done anywhere else". I think its narrow minded and in the long run your only short cutting yourself from games on other platforms.
|
I agree aswell. But im curious, ´cus i haven't really seen anyone in this thread claiming that "ps3 is better than anything else"? Might have missed it, but most people in here seem to just think that these games are worthy of being recognised as the top of the class when it comes to visual orgasm.
|
And Your right those games do deserve to be recognised for visual excellence because they are great looking games, not because they have the playstation logo on them.
