twesterm said:
That's the talk of someone who knows he's lost to me. And I really don't remember who (nor do I care), but this started because someone said that RE5 should be ported to the Wii. I'm simply saying it's not going to happen and nobody can come up with a concrete good reason why it should other than RE4 sold well and it had a good control scheme. That isn't factoring in the most major factor: cost. You can't prove it's going to be cheap and common sense says that it would be an intense project. Intense = expensive. I really don't have anything else to prove. |
One of Capcom's producers said that the game could (not will, but could) come to the Wii, just that they were waiting until other projects were finished to even consider it. Naznatips posted links to that, which I guess you didn't bother to look at.
Plus even if intense=expensive, you still have to prove it will be intense in the first place.
Finally, that first comment shows your problem. You are more interesting in winning an argument than being right. Sorry, but I didn't say I was going to concede. I said I won't bother arguing when you cheat, and twisting words is cheating.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs