By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
twesterm said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
twesterm said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
So I actually post links, you post none, but you still pretend you have don't have to prove as much.

Sorry, but you have to prove that those factors are hard to get around, since you made the claim first. And being less powerful is not enough to make the game expensive to port. I posted those costs as possible maximums. You are claiming those are the absolute minimums. You have to prove that.

You also have to prove the port will take two years.

You've posted links to an article saying that Wii games cost less (and I had already mentioned that number ealier) to make and definitions to what a game engine is (which didn't prove anything), that's really not a lot of proof.

Also, Capcom hasn't made any claims that they have any plans to port the game to the Wii so I have no reason to defend anything, you are the one trying to say that a port to the Wii is possible and should be done because it wouldn't be hard.

 

I did not claim it should be done. You're just putting words in my mouth. If you can't even refute my actual points, and futhermore ignore the rules of burden of proof, I'm not going to argue further, as you are clearly cheating, to "prove" your points.


That's the talk of someone who knows he's lost to me.

And I really don't remember who (nor do I care), but this started because someone said that RE5 should be ported to the Wii. I'm simply saying it's not going to happen and nobody can come up with a concrete good reason why it should other than RE4 sold well and it had a good control scheme. That isn't factoring in the most major factor: cost. You can't prove it's going to be cheap and common sense says that it would be an intense project. Intense = expensive. I really don't have anything else to prove.


 One of Capcom's producers said that the game could (not will, but could) come to the Wii, just that they were waiting until other projects were finished to even consider it. Naznatips posted links to that, which I guess you didn't bother to look at.

Plus even if intense=expensive, you still have to prove it will be intense in the first place.

Finally, that first comment shows your problem. You are more interesting in winning an argument than being right. Sorry, but I didn't say I was going to concede. I said I won't bother arguing when you cheat, and twisting words is cheating. 



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs