LordTheNightKnight said:
twesterm said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
So I actually post links, you post none, but you still pretend you have don't have to prove as much.
Sorry, but you have to prove that those factors are hard to get around, since you made the claim first. And being less powerful is not enough to make the game expensive to port. I posted those costs as possible maximums. You are claiming those are the absolute minimums. You have to prove that.
You also have to prove the port will take two years. |
You've posted links to an article saying that Wii games cost less (and I had already mentioned that number ealier) to make and definitions to what a game engine is (which didn't prove anything), that's really not a lot of proof. Also, Capcom hasn't made any claims that they have any plans to port the game to the Wii so I have no reason to defend anything, you are the one trying to say that a port to the Wii is possible and should be done because it wouldn't be hard. |
I did not claim it should be done. You're just putting words in my mouth. If you can't even refute my actual points, and futhermore ignore the rules of burden of proof, I'm not going to argue further, as you are clearly cheating, to "prove" your points. |
That's the talk of someone who knows he's lost to me. 
And I really don't remember who (nor do I care), but this started because someone said that RE5 should be ported to the Wii. I'm simply saying it's not going to happen and nobody can come up with a concrete good reason why it should other than RE4 sold well and it had a good control scheme. That isn't factoring in the most major factor: cost. You can't prove it's going to be cheap and common sense says that it would be an intense project. Intense = expensive. I really don't have anything else to prove.
Essay Pro