TheRealMafoo said:
Sorry, but this line struck me.
You think the delta between the poor and the rich are due to inequality?
You think that somehow people are less "equal" today then they were in 1969?
You have a very strange view of equality. Also, I want to point out that each year, we get less capitalistic, and more socialists, and the delta between the poor and the rich keeps growing. Shouldn't that indicates something?
It is my theory, that the more you give to someone, the less willing they are to work, and a working man will always prosper past one who does not.
So ya, put a few million on government assistance, watch them learn to live within those means while the rest of the US prospers, and then watch the gap grow.
If then your solution is to take more from the rich and give to the poor, your crazy. That's the problem, not the solution. |
America, as well as most of the world (except maybe Venezuela or something), has become more and more capitalist. In America, since 1969 the minimum wage has decreased, the gap between rich and poor continues to widen, and all the while scientific achievement has grinded to a halt as the free market focuses on business and entertainment technology. As I said before, scientific advancement in the last 40 years is nothing compared to the scientific advancement 40 years prior to that.
Economically speaking, I dont understand how you can argue that people are more equal today than they were in 1969. I thought that your argument was the the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting richer more slowly. As I said before, stating that the poor in 2009 are better off than the poor in 1969 is no better an observation than stating that the poor in 2009 are better off than the poor in 1069.
