vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:
vlad321 said:
yo_john117 said:
Consoles are way better imo. They are way more user-friendly, and with integrated communities like live, they are more fun. They are way better for FPS, (It actually takes skill as oppossed to point and click) Co-op orientated games, Rythm games, (try hooking up Rock Band to your computer and playing with 4 people) and pretty much every other genre is just more fun with consoles. Plus Pc's are more expensive, and their graphics for the most part are about the same as consoles.
PC is so better for RTS's, and MMO's (WOW!!!) but thats about it
|
Post 'o Fail.
FPS better on consoles? Really? Point and click? The PC shooters are the only ones that take actual skill. By the time Master Chief turns around I can go take a piss. And don't give me that whole "strategy" crap either. Go play an RTS if you are dying for a stretegy. As it stands consoles shooters are extremely simple and easy.
I concede only party games (not lan parties) and platformers to consoles. Everythign else is better on the PC.
|
You've obviously never played a FPS on a console before. So whats so skillfull about point and clicking?
|
The fact that the target moves about 3 times faster, while you yourself also moves 3 times faster. What's so skillful about moving the reticule slowly over someone who is basically crawling across the screen?
|
That only applies to Team Fortress (at least from what i've seen) And team fortress is on consoles too so that logic fails.
And having played Counter Strike and Halo 3 before, I can easily say they move about the same speed (I think counter strike is a little faster)
You saying stuff like this just backs up my point that you have never played a console FPS...
