By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
nightsurge said:
Staude said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
@Smashed - As a dual HD console owner, im just stating the my opinon, Nintendos motion + and Sonys Wands + PSEye feel sort of out-dated VS NATAL, but if Sony can make this work out RIGHT then it might be equal with NATAL, as of right now though i'd rather sonys idea a 8 while MS gets a 9.

natal is the most limiting of the three. It only allows for on rail games.. Cause theres no controller.

 

ps3 has the best solution with dual analogues you'll be able to move and turn without having to point at the edge of the screen (a frustration in wii games)

 

not to mention the backup of sony and the pseye that can use various headtracking and other tools to add to the immersion.

 

Imagine a first person shooter with the wands but also using headtracking :p awesome.

Actually Sony's motion is the most limited of the three.  It only allows for on rails games because there is no analog sticks.  They have not confirmed nor even stated they will be adding any, so you can stop assuming that will be the case.

Also, you need 2 wands just to track 2 points in 3D space, while Natal can track 48 points without having you buy up to 8 wands for multiplayer.  Anything else such as mapping objects over your hands and what-not is also possible on Natal.  So basically Natal can do everything and more than Sony's motion can do, without the need to buy up to 8 wands.  And of course there is limitless options where Natal can augment normal controller based gameplay using leaning, voice recognition, etc.

And finally, head tracking in any game would be basically pointless (except for Natal games since you use your whole body and head tracking is just part of the overall body tracking).  You can only turn your head slightly and still see the screen well.  Such small movements won't be beneficial to the experience.  Neither would moving around the room to get different angles like the current head tracking technology is limited to.

Even if you were to be correct you would stil be wrong. Concidering that it has buttons you'd be able to perform tasks that you cant with natal.

Another thing is that you are basing your thing on assumption (one that is wrong) while i based my post on fact. Sony said you'll be able to play all ps3 games with the wands. In other words, they will have analogues. So you can stop assuming they wont.

 

Sure you can track 48 points when natal works on a person. But what does that let you do ? On Rail shoo.. oh wait. No.. you don't have a trigger button. On Rail Kick Boxing. So basically natal can do nothing that comes even close to what sonys tech can do and it's only advantage is that you don't need to buy 8 of them to be 4 people playing. But who needs 4 controllers normally anyways.. i mean i have 3 and that's pretty decent concidering most local multiplayer games are 2 player split screen.

Snap.

Oh and i will refrain from commenting on the rest because it's obvious from all of your post that you reek ignorance and a lack of knowledge. I hope my post helped you in that aspect, concidering that you should now know that sonys wand is superior and that everything you stated was wrong.



Check out my game about moles ^