By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Esmoreit said:
Well Kasz, I hear a lot of news on message boards first. Micheal Jackson's death being the latest case.

But, I am willing to believe in a unicorn for instance, in that evolution or genetic mutation can easily result in a bone portruding from a skull. A chupacabra? Maybe but I'd rather believe the mangy dog theory.

Snowman? Could be, Himalaya is huge and there might be an ape-like being on a snowy mountain, or several. Loch Ness I don't believe, the lake is too small to harbor such a creature and we would've had accounts since the middle ages at least.

how can you say the LOCH is too small for "such" a mythological creature as a water-dweilling beast? and FYI,  it has a surface area of 56.4 km2, is deeper than the height of the BT Tower in London (deepest point 230m) AND contains more fresh water than all the lakes in England and Wales put together (so its perfectly feasible that it harbours a large animal )

also, i have undebateable proof that mermaids DO exist. this one was found washed up on Portobello Beach this May.



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.