Kasz216 on 12 September 2009
| Rath said: However Roger Penrose (the person whos paper Tegmark was disputing) has written a critique of that critique. I don't really understand the mathematics behind it but apparently one of the variables Tegmark used wasn't correct. Also I'm not saying that peoples choices are always 50/50 - I'm just saying there is a possibility that their choice isn't always 100/0. Even you used the term 'very rarely', not never - if you think they ever do then you believe that free-will is not an illusion. Can you please clarify your stance? Or you deterministic or not? Compatibaiist or incompatibilist? Also saying quantum theory free will doesn't bear out experimentation is bollocks, nobody has devised an experiment to falsify it yet. |
The problem is your using the term deterministic an undeterministic wrong.
Determinsitic thought would suggest that people are like computer. Who would always choose the best course of action.
The fact that people are swayed by non-relvent things such as racism make people nondeterministic.
