"L4D2 Boycott Founders Goes to Valve - Enjoys L4D2"

[big_boss]

MAFKKA said:
Ive played them all.. LMAO!

And you're nitpicking and you try to sidetrack my point. No need for it kid, no need. And you're missing the point... each and everyone of the GTA games had a different story. Thats the main thing in the GTA franchise, the story (and the "in your face" attitude). And i've played the game since GTA1, GTA2, GTA London btw. So once again, no need in trying to lecture me.

But if a both games, in this case the L4D games, dosent have a story, then its very hard to differentiate the sequal from the first installment, am i right? If there's nothing "new to tell", then its just a facelift. How can you justify the need to spend full price on something that's the same besides the way things look? You might aswell just play free games over the internet. Mahjong is alot of fun. Same concept. You click where you want stuff to happen, and you get nothing in return besides the satisfaction of completing a game. And i know i know i know thats lowballing it, no need to sidetrack the issue further by attacking that statement.

Why wouldnt you just be satisfied with playing L4D? Why is it worth 60$ (360) and 50$ (PC) just to get new weapons, maps and characters? When there are games out there that gives you all of this in the form of patches, DLCs etc..

Would you pay 60$ for the zombie mode in COD:WAW? Would you pay 60$ for the Tatooine DLC for Star Wars Unleashed? Would you pay 60$ for MGS DLC for LBP? All of which gives you the same amount of hard content. New weapons, new game modes, new characters, new enemies, new singleplayer campaigns, new achievements, new game experiences, new maps and new ways to add extra value to the original game.

Bingo! The content is not the only thing in question, its price is as well.