By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JEDE3 said:
disolitude said:

I don't know man...Uncharted 1 had huge focus on presentation and gameplay was a Tomb Raider and gears of war offspring. Nothing really was wrong with it but it wasn't original in any way.

Think about it this way... Strip away the amazing visuals. Does uncharted even work as a game with out that? Not really. The movie-like gameplay for Uncharted (and gears) would be laughable if they didn't look good.

Naughty Dog should try and make a puzzle game and see if they know how to engage a player without relying on presentation so much.


Joke post? Most games are repetitive and un-original. Every ONCE in a while a game is fresh. GeoW, LBP, First few of the Wii series. I mean... the highest selling games like Halo and CoD are much more repetitive and un-original than uncharted was.,

 

You're comparing two games with online gameplay, splitscreen, co-op, and tons of tweakable options, to a 10-hour'ish-long campaign and calling them repetitive? The definition of "repetitive" must've changed recently....

 

Some people here make a really good point. In the long run, graphics really are nothing. Why is it that Halo3/CoD are always used for comparisons? Why isn't Halo3/Killzone2? KZ2 was being hyped to death because of it's graphics, but look at it now. It's rarely ever brought up for it's gameplay. When the next graphics king comes along, it'll become even less popular. There's a reason why some ancient games are still praised and mentioned often today.

 

Now I'm not saying Uncharted 2 is gonna suck, I'm just not too sure about it yet. I don't want it to be another KZ2. The online is what has me most interested, but outside graphics, there's not much we know about the game.

 

 



http://soundcloud.com/cathode

PSN: Parasitic_Link