By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
wholikeswood said:
yo_john117 said:
wholikeswood said:

3 year cycle sounds great, but I don't think the engine comparison of Halo 2 to Halo 3 is super flattering as the leap there wasn't huge.

And I can't see this being a bigger launch than Halo 3. :O

Dude the difference in graphics between them was huge.  That's like saying the difference between F2 and F3 isn't that big.

I didn't see it. I enjoyed the game for different reasons, mostly the coop campaign. I love coop campaign.

Halo 2 mp:

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2004/screen0/562116_20040510_screen006.jpg

 

Halo 3 mp:

http://www.cfcdeveloper.com/enclosures/halo3.jpg

 

While the jump isn't astronomical, their is very marked improvements.  The lighting is so much better, as are the textures on the models and environments.  If we see a similar jump in quality, Halo: Reach won't be like a Killzone 2 or anything, but definitely up to the level of a Mass Effect or maybe Gears of War.