By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MAFKKA on 10 September 2009
Edit Thread
Mendicate Bias said:
MAFKKA said:
Alot of "backwards-cap-wearing American teens" up in this thread.

I dont think he ment the graphics were bad per se. His main complaint is that its just like Halo 3, nothing new and improved. He feels that its a game they put out there just to get some sales. Sort of like whats been said about L4D2.

What the hell is that supposed to mean? Stop trying to infer that everyone that likes Halo is a frat boy. I don't care about your insecurities there's no need to act ignorant. 

People in this thread are ridiculous. Why is it only the Sony fans that agree with the article in this thread? Hey guys Since MAG has horrible graphics compared to other PS3 exclusives that means it brings nothing new to the table and just sucks in general 

Some of the users on this site...

First of all those are not my words.. thats what the writer called the people they thought would start crying about the article.

Second.. "i don't care about your insecurites", now thats personal. And uncalled for. And no need to get all hostile over the internet haha.

And what does the PS3, and MAG, have to do with the article? And why would you want to troll it? Insecure? :D Sorry, just had to.

And like i said before. The writer isnt downplaying the graphics, his initial hype over a Halo title being released just got crushed since he had high expectations. And then to only find out that the game is just an "expansion" made him feel sad and underwhelmed. Basic as that. That dosent exclude that the game will be just as epic as Halo 3 or less fun. But people like you just read the title, sense the negativity and go bananas and start to twist words.