| KungKras said: ^ Different RTS games have different values depending on the style of the player I guess. I enjoy all kinds of RTS games, both the strategic and the technical (in lack of better words). But there is just something about starcraft. It's so ridiculously good at being a technical RTS that it's immortal not even WC3 that was released much later surpassed it. |
I definitely agree that WCIII wasn't as good as StarCraft. Though I think that WCIII was trying to do something different. But seeing as how it was utilizing a very common formula that StarCraft basically perfected, it was plagued with being deemed a quazi-sequel to StarCraft and was never going to meet anyones expectations, either to beat the most popular RTS up to that time or to surpass the most popular Blizzard game ever.
Which I feel is going to be the same fate for StarCraft II.











