iclim4 said:
Sure it's ok if we disagree but we're not at a roadblock yet. Admittedly I did repeat much of my post but it's only to move it to a lighter note, to stress out my points and to summarize the conversation. From what I understand you make it seem like they're telling you forcefully to buy the game along with their patch when in reality they're requesting you to buy the game when you can. They don't actually say to only use their patch on an original copy, but only not to distribute their patch with an illegal copy to other people. I mean you can actually give pirated copies of Tsukihime and still be in a loophole. Explain to me again in summary how that makes them moral fags, pretentious, putting themselves up on a pedestal or having moral superiority? Honest question. You can even copy paste key entences from old posts if you want. |
Like I said before, it's not the fact that they're telling me to buy a game. That shoud be expected. If you can buy the game, you should. It's the fact that buying the game is impossible in the sense of paying the creators to get their product. And them telling me to do such an action is why I thought it was pretentious and therefore worthy of being a "moral fag" (a pretentious, self righteous preacher).
So in summary:
1. The action they tell us to do is nearly, if not actually, impossible (depending on your interpretation of buying via auction/used satisfies giving the creators their dues or not).
2. Therefore because they tell us to do such an impossible action, I felt that they were being pretentious.
That's it >.< I can't summarize it anymore, and it's what I replied over and over, so I know it won't change your opinion like you couldn't change mine.









