By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
disolitude on 03 September 2009
Edit Thread
Strategyking92 said:
disolitude said:
Strategyking92 said:
so, NES, SNES and genesis are left.. what else?
Also: xbox 1 over ps3? Even I know that's wrong. But in terms of contribution to gaming though, I could see it. But my heart says ps3>xbox.

Is it because of teh CELL or bluray? Xbox only had a Pentium 3 and DVD... Thats pretty pathetic tech if you ask this guy

http://www.vgchartz.com/profiles/profile.php?id=547

More like because it has alot more "good" exclusives than the first xbox. Keep in mind, microsoft was just learning the ropes back then. There are several examples where a good portion of exclusives went bad. Kung fu chaos, Azurk(was billed as an xbox poster child along with halo), and tao feng being bright examples.

If you are in to Japanese gaming I fully agree with you. But xbox1 was heaven for action gamers. Not to mention for people that didn't own a solid PC at the time.

Ninja Gaiden, DOA3, Riddick, 2 Doom 3 games, Half Life 2, Halos, PGR, Forza, Jade Empire, Fable, Kotor... Not to mention that multiplats were superior on Xbox compared to other systems and that it did HD (480p or 720p in some games) back in 2001 and that it had an online network in 2003.

I do agree that the library between PS3 and xbox is close and that PS3 will end up with way more memorable titles...but as things stand now...2 of the 3 next gen console are marching to the online/HD tune that xbox1 started.