By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
yo_john117 said:
Xoj said:
Lord Flashheart said:
Xoj said:
yo_john117 said:

So its acceptable to pay for Qore but not XBL even though you can get them for near the same price.   Right >_>

Qore is optional, and i will never pay for it.

i just want my multiplayer online free. and i got it =).

XBL Gold is optional and a lot chose never to pay for it it just seems like some people here act like you HAVE to pay for it. Personally qore is a bigger rip-off as demos should be free.

Gold it's not optinal for Multiplayer gaming. >_

Just like Qore isn't optional if you want to play demos of most games <_< >_>

Demos of games from Qore... hmmm there's only been like 5 of them off there all of them showed up on the psstore later, you did say 'most' so you're misleading us all.  This is not most it's just a few.

I recon a few of you guys think it's worth the cost, that's fair that someone could come to that conclusion, it's an oppinion.  The problem is that we're forced to pay for it to play online.  If this was the general consenssus that the experience and features of live are worth paying for, Microsoft should have no problem offering a more bare-bones experience that does allow multiplayer gaming.  Since the majority of people thought xboxlive was worth the cost they'd surely pay up right??  Microsoft doesn't do this because they know not many people would buy live anymore.

The qore comparisons are almost laughable to me because It's OPTIONAL, most PS3 owners probably don't even know what it is.  Not paying for qore doesn't restrict you from playing all games online.