dtewi said:
The Truth said:
dtewi said:
The Truth said:
dtewi said:
The Truth said:
Well, I'm not a huge fan of homosexuals either, mainly due to their activities. I mean I always see lesbians snogging on street corners (disgusting), but I never see straight folks doing that. Also, I know this is very stereotypical of me and there are alot of gays out there who are different, but I see most homosexuals as people who aren't interested in meaningful relationships but more just sex, like they seek fuck-buddies rather than partners.
Personal experiences put me off homosexuals, I get uncomfortable when I see gays or lesbains snogging or touching on the streets, it's just not nice imo.
Flame me, do whatever you like. This is my opinion, and I know I have been stereotypical. There are good gays out there. Keep in mind that I live in Ireland which is basically made up of white straight people. There are basically no black people or homosexuals where I live. |
If you KNEW that you were using stereotypes and KNEW that your country has a low homosexual population and you KNEW it would piss people off, why the hell would you post it other than to be a complete ass?
|
Ugh, some people need to toughen up. I never insulted anyone in my post, I gave my opinion, come back with something not so sensitive and more constructive next time.
|
You used stereotypes. Those are insulting. What if I used the stereotype every conservative I met are gay-bashing bible-loving republicans? It may be true for a few, but to say it like it applies to everyone is an insult.
|
But my stereotypes likely apply to the majority of gays and basically every homosexual Ive seen know. Is it an offense to call someone more sexually influenced than long term relationship influenced?
You know this yourself, you see few homosexuals settling down/having relationships together, but you see alot of feminine like males around and its obvious what they are looking for.
|
So you took a look at dozens, maybe hundreds, of million of gay people and determine that the vast majority are promiscuous, effeminate, and unable to hold a relationship? Your kind of attitude towards homosexuals is sickening.
|
I do oppose the existence of "gay leader" and how SOME gays are trying to create a "gay culture". That makes no fucking sense >.< Again, pride and trying to create your own culture only alienates yourself and sets yourself apart as being different, than the same, as everyone else.
Being gay is a sexual orientation, not a life style, not a ideolgy, etc. I hope that there's a back lash, just as like there has been with Atheists (who've begun to start criticizing the word Atheism itself) recently, within the gay community at any attempt within to try to group, unite, and distinguish themselves through other means aside the simple fact of sexual orientation.
Gays don't need to be wearing a certain fashion, use lingo, hang out at gay bars (well, actually it makes practical sense for the sake of picking up people... so maybe not), etc. They should be asking to be seen no differently due to their sexual orientation, but it pains me to then see "gay leaders" fucking crush the whole point of gay rights and the movements by actually giving credence to what the bigots were saying. That because of their sexual orientation they are different, unique, etc. Sexual orientation doesn't do shit to your character! >.< That's why it's not worthy of shame or pride. That's why you don't have to act effeminetly, dress a certain way, hang out at certain places, etc.
It's both the bigots and those from within that are actually doing the same thing. One accuses, and one gives credence to the accuser.
