Xoj said:
Lord Flashheart said:
Xoj said:
yo_john117 said:
Xoj said:
illuvatar said: I agree with rover, anyone who pays for a gold subscription does so to enjoy a service which is monitored and maintained. if there was a problem with Live Microsoft has an obligation to repair it quickly because people pay for the service, also from my personal experience from when my brother brings his ps3 round is that Live has more on offer IMHO, such as demo's, videos and movies, xbla and games on demand, facbook and twitter when they're available and for me in England premiership football when that's available |
actually PSN never been down for more than couple ours and if its down its only for mainteniance.
everything you mentioned its available on PSN also demos if you suscribe to Qore.
|
So its acceptable to pay for Qore but not XBL even though you can get them for near the same price. Right >_>
|
Qore is optional, and i will never pay for it.
i just want my multiplayer online free. and i got it =).
|
XBL Gold is optional and a lot chose never to pay for it it just seems like some people here act like you HAVE to pay for it. Personally qore is a bigger rip-off as demos should be free.
|
Gold it's not optinal for Multiplayer gaming. >_>
|
And a monthly fee isn't optional to just play the game if it's an MMO. your point?
Gold is optional. Like with all things optional if it's a service if you want that service you make a decision to pay for it. This isn't anything new.
If you want to play multiplayer and willing to pay then whats the issue? People are aware of the alternatives yet still chose this so what does that say?