What I find disturbing about the whole pro-homo arguments, is this whole "appeal to nature" fallacy, that sounds something like this:
"The were born like this, it's not their decision"
"Even animals do it, it's natural"
"They are just following their urges"
But they conveniently ignore, that in a society, NO ONE can perfectly follow their natural urges, because society restricts us by common morals, even if they don't make much sense.
Obviously, when someone else is got hurt, it's bad, so it's understandable why you are not allowed to kill someone when you feel a natural urge to do so.
But what about cases when no one gets hurt?
A few weeks ago, there was an incest thread, and most people where freaked out simply for "Oh no! That's just disgusting, and WRONG!" without proper reasons.
Most of us understand that there is a taboo, against consensual incest between two adults, and don't do it, even opress urges.
The same goes for necrophilia, cannibalism, exhibitionism, and generally lots of weird fetishes that people are expected to keep for themselves only because they are disgusting.
I kinda miss the time when homosexuality was one of these.
