Slimebeast said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
Slimebeast said:
JaggedSac said:
I was going to say the exact same thing Slimebeast, but I did not feel like derailing the thread more. But I agree. They look the same to me. |
Great. Now that we agree Hyams is a lier we can move on and talk about Kingdom Under Fire II again. 
J/k, but really, the KUF II video looked great and I believe the X360 version will be very close to that quality.
I dunno if the gameplay will be fun though.
|
Massive Win Slime Beast..Massive WIN!!!!!!
If you like RTS it will...People need to understand...This is not a Hack & Slash game...you can practically go through the whole game without hacking and slash...well..during the key parts of the story when you have to defeat an enemy general you have fight and need to use this mode wisely...But you still have control of all your other troops unless the story has them blocked off...which you must understand is what the game devs wants you to do at that certain point and gives you the feeling of how big and open the game world is..and how in depth the physics are..your archers are useless in a forest and every class has it's pros and cons...also...when controling your general...it's fluid and very resposive and requires it's own strtergy and is affected by how you upgrade your general...so it's no button mashing madness...
|
I was gonna say the gameplay looks repetitive and slightly boring because it's so much hack'n slash, but your description of the RTS-aspects and the complete gameplay experience got me really excited.
"Open game world", that I still doubt though.
|
Don't doubt. you will get it soon enough,And no..I don't mean like SandBox..But there is a World Map which is part of it's RPG elements..
